



A growing number of founders are reaching the same conclusion after their first attempt at DIY investor relations: building genuine investor relationships in-house is a full-time job most companies can't afford to have someone doing badly.
Founders often underestimate how much time genuine investor relationship-building actually requires — identifying the right investors, building relationships over months, organizing events, managing follow-up, and doing all of it while also running the actual company. What looks like occasional outreach is, done properly, a substantial ongoing commitment.
Founders who try to handle this alongside running their company often end up doing neither well — outreach becomes sporadic, relationships stay shallow, and events get organized reactively rather than strategically.
Not every company needs outsourced investor relations. Founders with genuine existing investor networks, or those at a stage where fundraising isn't imminent, may not need the full infrastructure an outsourced approach provides. The calculation changes significantly once a company is actively raising or planning to raise within the next 6-12 months.
On that last point, ask your lawyer to review any arrangement before you sign. Paying for investor introductions can raise legal questions depending on how it is structured — see Finder vs. Broker-Dealer: The Legal Risk of Paying for Investor Intros.
Outsourcing works best when roles are clear. Some things should stay with the founder no matter what:
A partner can usually take on the parts that eat time without needing the founder’s judgment: building and maintaining target lists, organizing events, scheduling, preparing update templates and tracking follow-up.
For example, suppose a founder estimates that running investor relations properly would take around ten hours a week for six months. That is roughly 250 hours away from customers, product and hiring. The question is not only what a partner costs, but what those hours are worth to the business — and whether a partner with existing relationships would get better results in the same time.
If you decide to build the function in-house instead, start with a clear plan and a simple tracking system. See Investor Relations for Private Companies: Building the Function Before You Need It.
No — early-stage founders often benefit the most, since they typically have the least existing investor network and the most to gain from access to established relationships.
Not necessarily — it's most effective as a complement to founder-led relationship building, providing infrastructure and access that would otherwise take years to build independently.
If you're actively raising or planning to raise within the next year, and don't have an extensive existing investor network, it's worth evaluating.
Genuine investor relationship-building is a real skill and a real time commitment — outsourcing it to an established network can compress years of relationship-building into a much shorter timeline. Learn more about our investor relations services or get in touch.



.png)




